Which side would the gangs be on; or would they just loot & burn anything & everything?
Would the illegals flee south; or would Mexico send “help” to protect their nationals?
Anybody remember the alleged Chinese weapons warehouses?
Who else would try to join in the fun?
The guy is worse than an idiot.
I figure the 1st. Free speech for me but not for thee seems to be their cup o tea.
What a total moron.
Obviously the libs want nothing to do with sanctity of the home, personal freedoms, ownership of private property, personal privacy or any of the other cornerstones of the American system of individual freedoms and liberties.
I think The Gipper said it best:
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling and empty building.
And civil war would begin almost immediately. Cops on these task forces will become the highest mortality job in the nation.
Can you see them trying this in South Central LA or Texas for God's sakes? These cops would get wasted on sight.
I can just see a lot of police officers and politicians getting their homes burned down and vehicles set on fire if this was ever implemented.
"If you LIKE the War on Drugs
You'll LOVE the War on Guns!"
(Weirdly enough, a few of the lefty types I know are themselves cop-hating, gun-owning anarchists who'd probably fight just as hard against this sort of police-state insanity as any Freeper. Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed...)
The Congress that passed such a law and the president who signed and enforced it would be thrown out at the next election, and the politicians know it.
SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
Is he willing to give up the First Amendment, too?
What a load of very un-American crap.
He hasn’t been to the UK or Australia lately, has he?
Obama Touts Gun-Control
Cho Seung-Hui, the presumed mentally ill gunman who shot 32 people at Virginia Tech inspired Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) to urge that laws should be strengthened to prevent the mentally ill from buying guns. Federal laws already prohibit those confirmed to be mentally ill from purchasing guns. Obama says these laws don’t go far enough.
“Existing laws miss the point,” Obama said. “A desire to own a gun should, by itself, be considered prima facie evidence of mental illness. I mean, who would want a gun? In this modern age, gun ownership is an anachronism. The average home-owner isn’t hunting to put food on his family’s table. He doesn’t need to fight off savages who would rape his wife and murder or abduct his children. Why does he need a gun? It’s nuts.”
Under Obama’s proposal, a new federal Gun Registry Administration Bureau (GRAB) would be established. GRAB would be authorized to review all state laws pertaining to gun ownership and void those deemed unsuitably “loose.” “Under our Constitution, regulation of firearms is a federal responsibility,” Obama claimed. “States must not be permitted to usurp this authority through lax enforcement.”
Obama insisted that “those truly in need of owning a weapon will still have access. All they have to do is demonstrate to the satisfaction of federal agents that they have a legitimate need for it.” Obama did admit, though, that demonstrating such a need would be difficult since the mere expression of a need for a firearm would normally be considered disqualifying.
In related news, California Assemblyman Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) introduced a bill (AB 362) that would put restrictions on ammunition. De Leon applauded himself for “finding a loophole in the Second Amendment.” “The Bill of Rights says people have the right to bear arms,” de Leon pointed out. “It doesn’t say anything about bullets.”
De Leon congratulated himself on coming up with “a bullet-proof solution to mass murders like the ones we saw at Virginia Tech. Without bullets, Cho would’ve been stopped before he started.”
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
Ver are your papers?
Ver you born in Amerika?
Give us all your veapons, now Schnel.
To ze concentration camp mit you. Ve know how to treat people like you.
Bring it on Simpson.....we triple dog dare you!
ping
If it does happen they absolutely should start in East LA, I’m sure MS13 will just passively disarm themselves. And if we cannot win the war on drug smuggling then what about gun smuggling? Our southern borders will have so many gunrunners it would make it absolutely impossible to observe much less try to ferret out gun runners from dope runners or illegals or terrorists which of course will see a huge continental free-fire mall, school, stadium shooting zone.
I agree it will be all about informants and I think it would be wise to keep that in mind about who knows what just in case.
But in a morbid manner I hope it does happen, it would be the impetous to house clean our government.
It would be much easier to allow the US to be like Israel, let teenaged girls carry an Uzi to ballet class. Plus it should drastically reduce date rapes. More than likely a state like Alaska will leave the US, with our oil reserve we could hold off maintenance on the pipeline and gas will become cheaper in Italy within a month. Alaskans will never lay down arms because then the bears will be at the top of the food chain, unless Hitlery feels like sleeping with the bears is better.
Bring it on, BABY....!!!
The populous is to be well armed for use AGAINST a tyrannical government and thus ensure our own liberties.
I don't think that very many LEOs would be very happy about trying to carry this out. How many firefights would it take before they become downright hostile to the idea. My guess is not many.
This can all be prevented by NOT electing to office, anyone who doesn't reject this idea out of hand.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)