To: blam
So I guess this means she’s not a liberal any more?
To: Disambiguator
It is ironic when enablers, themselves, become victims.
To: Disambiguator
Has Al Sharpton weighed in (no pun) on this incident?
40 posted on
04/28/2007 7:15:12 PM PDT by
pointsal
(q)
To: Disambiguator
So I guess this means she’s not a liberal any more?I have a tagline that addresses her plight...
48 posted on
04/28/2007 7:19:15 PM PDT by
Migraine
To: Disambiguator
So I guess this means she’s not a liberal any more? Liberalism is only for the masses, never for the preachers of liberalism.
To: Disambiguator
If she only had a gun she could have protested herself! Oh thats right disarm the citizen, arm the criminal! Ya know the perp is a victim to, right libs? He must have been suffering from urban stress. Comin back at you! How does it feel? We are in the trenches every day with this loonacy you have graced us with. ACLU to the rescue!!!!!!!
115 posted on
04/29/2007 4:32:36 AM PDT by
ronnie raygun
(ID RATHER BE HUNTING WITH DICK THAN DRIVING WITH TED)
To: Disambiguator
Absolutley not. It means she’ll now favor knife control and making mugging illegal.
122 posted on
04/29/2007 7:59:29 AM PDT by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson