Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
...it would seem an honest judge should throw out the charges on statutory grounds alone.

Surely you jest. This is Chicago. The law is what King Richard says it is. An honest judge in this town? Surely you jest. Oh, I already said that.

177 posted on 05/01/2007 9:32:01 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: facedown
Surely you jest. This is Chicago. The law is what King Richard says it is. An honest judge in this town? Surely you jest. Oh, I already said that.

Does King Richard control the IllSC? They've dealt with a number of firearm issues on statutory grounds, generally somewhat reasonably. The interpretation of the statute I've proffered would be both consistent with the text and logical. Further, in the case of people who are arrested more than 31 days after they can prove that they filed their FOID application (e.g. because the check cleared more than 31 days previously), the defendants should have the right to argue that the only their actions could even remotely be construed as criminal is that the state itself violated the law.

178 posted on 05/01/2007 9:49:50 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson