[SJackson]

I've seen many threads, I've seen the people who have been banned, I've seen the general level of conversation on FR which includes commentary like this on a daily basis, so I'm not convinced.

The bannings are about support for Guiliani, who is a liberal GOP candidate. Nothing more.

[dirtboy]

The bannings are about support for Guiliani, who is a liberal GOP candidate. Nothing more.

Wrong. There are still many pro-Rudy posters here. The ones who trashed either conservative candidates or conservative values are not.

[kevkrom]

I've seen many threads, I've seen the people who have been banned, I've seen the general level of conversation on FR which includes commentary like this on a daily basis, so I'm not convinced. The bannings are about support for Guiliani, who is a liberal GOP candidate. Nothing more.

Plenty of pro-Rudy folks still hanging around. They're just not trying to tear down conservatives to promote him.

Again, answer the questions from #243. The poster has been a Guiliani supporter for some time, so why the ban now? Because she knowingly and willfully spread false information designed to tear down a conservative to make Guiliani look better in comparison, and disregarded repeated warnings from Jim to stop.

[airborne]

The bannings are about support for Guiliani, who is a liberal GOP candidate. Nothing more.

Oh, there's more. Much more.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

Support Giuliani? Fine.

Lying about his record and words to make him look conservative? Not fine.

Lying about other candidates’ records and words to make him look better by comparison? Definitely not fine.

Big difference #1 and the last two.