[SJackson]

I've read the posts, i see worse that that here everyday.

This isn't about lying or the nature of the source.

It's about supressing criticism of selective GOP candidates.

Which is certainly FR's perrogative.

But see it for what it is.

[dirtboy]

This isn't about lying or the nature of the source. It's about supressing criticism of selective GOP candidates.

Horsecrap. You can claim that all you want. But the NewsMax article was a clear misrepresentation. And that's never been accepted on FR without challenge.

[kevkrom]

I've read the posts, i see worse that that here everyday. This isn't about lying or the nature of the source. It's about supressing criticism of selective GOP candidates. Which is certainly FR's perrogative. But see it for what it is.

If you or anyone else has legitimate criticisms, bring them on. Lies and half-truths are not acceptable, especially when used to prop up candidates who are about as anti-conservative as you can get.

[dirtboy]

It's about supressing criticism of selective GOP candidates.

This thread puts the lie to that:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1824302/posts

[kevkrom]

It's about supressing criticism of selective GOP candidates.

No it isn't. Can you honestly answer the questions I posed in my #243 with anything other than some variant of "Yes, she did." for each question?