Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
"...if someone supports an overwhelmingly pro-abort candidate like Rudy, they really don't have standing to challenge the relative pro-life bona fides of other candidates..."

This is closer to the impression I'm getting. I understand Jim's logic - FR isn't for supporting liberals, and he's said, no doubt with good reason, that Rudy is a liberal. I happen to agree, but then I don't think the GOP is particularly about conservatism anymore in the first place.

I am distressed to see so many of us gone for having supported a GOP candidate, one that is well thought of by most Americans, even if he does turn up as a "liberal" upon close examination. But the GOP has had its share of "liberals" over the years.

290 posted on 04/27/2007 10:24:40 AM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree
I am distressed to see so many of us gone for having supported a GOP candidate

They are not gone for that. Once again, they are gone for continuing to either spread falsehoods about conservative candidates or belittling core conservative values - after repeated warnings from JimRob to stop.

291 posted on 04/27/2007 10:26:09 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson