I think an objective reading of the record leads one to different conclusions than those you’ve both expressed regarding Veronica. Just my opinion. All are free to ignore it and move on.
And I think you're full of it. Here is the sentence from the article that Veronic posted:
He also called last month for "a tolerant nation" on gay rights."
And here is what Fred actually said:
Gay rights? I think that we ought to be a tolerant nation. I think we ought to be tolerant people. But we shouldn't set up special categories for anybody.
So Fred says he doesn't think there is "gay rights" per se - there should be no special categories. That is diametrically opposite of what the Newsmax article (and veronica) said.
Oh really?
Did she, or did she not, post an out-of-context quote from Thompson in order to falsely equate his position with Guiliani's?
Did she, or did she not, later admit that she knew the quote was out of context (something I had already known that she knew)?
Did she, or did she not, receive multiple public warnings from Jim to stop making those false assertions?
Did she, or did she not, persist in continuing those assertions after the warnings?