I do find it hard to argue a poster so involved in the discussions could possibly not know about the actual quote.
But unless we adopt a rule forbidding newsmax articles, I’d hate to see us trashing a rudy supporter for THAT, when there is other more substantive things we can use to refute the arguments made.
I try very hard to go back to primary sources when getting what a candidate says. Not because I’m perfect, but because I hate getting called a liar for believing what someone else wrote.
She new aout the actual quote. She even admitted posting it on this forum before. Her use of a secondary source, she new misrepresnted the original source is reprehesible.