Your question is a good follow up to the question of what specifically Rudy did in the wake of 9/11 that qualifies him to be president. Of course, there’s still the FACT that in his first seven and a half years as mayor, he did NOTHING about developing an evacuation plan for the WTC even though it had been attacked less than a year before he took office.
I’m still trying to understand just what it is that makes some republicans want to support this guy. They mention mention his strength on the WOT but never provide any specific policy proposals of his, and they mention his supposed electability, but I don’t see that neither. I’ve lurked at liberal sites and they hate Rudy. I’ve lurked at libertarian sites and they hate Rudy. And the so-called moderates are by all indications totally fed up with the situation in Iraq and are certainly not going to support any one they perceive as being overly aggressive in that area, so where are all these crossover votes suppose to come from? Methinks the Rudybots are living in la-la land.