Well, with as much as they’ve been plugging Rudy lately, I’m surprised they’ll actually allow a debate.
Uh-oh...
I have a feeling some of FR’s beloved vanity candidates might put on their Ralph Nader hats and start crying about not being let in the debates...
But it's kind of silly to include four candidates with about 1.1% support and exclude three with 0.9% support (for example).
Sounds like the debate won’t be worth watching, if they limit it to the big 3. Someone should set up a counter debate at the same time, and invite the conservatives.
I hope they allow Duncan Hunter. Since he is almost never a choice in national polls, it’s a long shot.
I hope they allow Duncan Hunter. Since he is almost never a choice in national polls, it’s a long shot.
Didn’t FOX used to have a show called The Biggest Loser, or something like that? Don’t know why I just thought of that...
Questions to freepers: If Rudy does become the republican candidate, will you still oppose him? Will you still refuse to vote for him? Will you vote for some other parochial candidate with no chance to win, thereby throwing your vote away and sending the Clintons back to Washington? Will you hold to your own cottage interests, even though we are in a war against homicical maniacs? Just curious. :)
Had to endure watching PMSNBC during lunch and all the DNC debate prep shenanigans.
Much has been made of the DNC’s shunning FOX NEWS for the debate. Not nearly as much made of the “news channel” they did choose, and why.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.