This time she skewers the "worship the earth and get rid of the humans" arm of those who want to control the entire world and create a utopia (for them). I used to have some sympathy for environmentalism - I also decry the destruction and pollution of farmland, wildland, and waters - but these people don't really care about these things. There are of course duped ones who are sentimentalists and whose ignorance is taken advantage of by the enviro-nazis. But the big honchos are using environmentalism as a ploy for one world government. If they cared so much about pollution, why don't they go after Red China??
And if they were so full of love for all nature, why do they hate human beings so much?
Only someone who understands that God is the owner of everything already (since He created it!), and everything should be respected and used properly since it all belongs to Him. The whole argument of enviro-wackos is this (aside from their desire to get rid of people and control the entire planet):
"We want a nice clean wild land so when we go rock climbing we don't have a lot of other people on the rock face. And we don't like seeing trailer parks with low life people while we're driving out in the country. This world belongs to us and we want it for our enjoyment, and there's too many (other) people in the way."
Enviro-nazis' main solution is to eliminate the "excess" humans.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Why don’t they go after Red China??? Very good question that no one seems to be asking esp after this tainted “pet” food scare. Guess it’s like this:
“Amerika bad, China (commie) good!
I am beginning to believe humans came from apes, we are so d-mn stupid.