Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Green power may ruin pristine land in California
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | April 24, 2007 | Daniel B. Wood

Posted on 04/25/2007 8:09:31 PM PDT by Lorianne

California and the city of Los Angeles have set an ambitious goal for 'greener' power: obtain 20 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2010.

But to do that difficult decisions need to be made. Wind, solar, and geothermal electric power produced in the rural reaches of the state must be somehow be transported to faraway cities – meaning some transmission lines must cut through national forests, wildlife refuges, and other treasured land areas.

Solar panels require the expanse and cloudless climes of desert areas, wind requires the funneling effect of mountain passes, and geothermal power is derived from hot or steamed water underground.

But how does the city get the energy to where it's needed without spoiling the pristine environments that it's trying to preserve?

"The fact of the matter is that renewable resources are from remote areas … and that is the challenge now facing California," says Stephanie McCorkle, spokeswoman for the California Independent Systems Operator. "We are trying to green the grid, and there are deadlines looming," she adds. "Transmission lines are the missing link. Where do we put them? That is what we have to decide."

It's all part of the "California greenin' " vision being trumpeted loudly and often by officials from Sacramento to Los Angeles. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has put the state in the forefront of developing alternative energy resources while Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa wants to make America's second-largest city "the greenest and cleanest city in America."

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: ironyalert
Thanks a lot moderator.
1 posted on 04/25/2007 8:09:31 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Oh dear! What will the “greenies” do?


2 posted on 04/25/2007 8:23:44 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I bet they are happy to use power from coal fired plants in Utah rather than use their own pristine resouces, just as they are happy to use the colorado river.


3 posted on 04/25/2007 8:29:21 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Limit your ability to have children to reduce the population.


4 posted on 04/25/2007 8:41:33 PM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
wind requires the funneling effect of mountain passes

On clear days, east-bound travelers driving over the San Gorgonio Pass in Riverside County, Calif., were once treated to a spectacular view of the Coachella Valley and the San Jacinto, Santa Rosa, and Little San Bernardino Mountains as they headed down into the desert. However, in recent years thousands of windmills have been constructed in the area, pretty much spoiling the view, but I never heard a peep from the environmentalist wackos--perhaps because the machines produce "green" power.

5 posted on 04/25/2007 8:43:04 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Theyre a bright bunch arent they?


6 posted on 04/25/2007 8:43:25 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Save the environment,
kill an environmentalist!

7 posted on 04/25/2007 9:06:57 PM PDT by TheDon (The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Actions and decisions have consequences.

I guess the silly granola eaters forgot that little bit of life.


8 posted on 04/25/2007 9:27:20 PM PDT by Chewbacca (I reject your reality and substitute my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Geothermal would actually be the better solution.


9 posted on 04/25/2007 9:30:00 PM PDT by Chewbacca (I reject your reality and substitute my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I bet they are happy to use power from coal fired plants in Utah rather than use their own pristine resouces, just as they are happy to use the colorado river.

At one time a few years back, they wanted to build a power station here in Arizona. Hypocrits!

10 posted on 04/25/2007 9:37:25 PM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; All

Hopefully, the actual global cooling trend that is coming (back to the temps of the 1800s), will set in before too much money and time is invested in the “greening of California”.


11 posted on 04/25/2007 11:47:51 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Not sure this is all that ironic. Other types of power generation also require major infrastructure (transmission lines and rail traffic for coal, pipelines for natural gas, drilling and mining, etc.). Regards, Thomas O. Gray American Wind Energy Association www.awea.org risingwind.blogspot.com
12 posted on 04/29/2007 6:39:49 PM PDT by tomgraywind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson