Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

Constitutionally we can have crew served weapons. For the first hundred years and more there was artillery in private hands with no government interference. It fell out of fashion because of the expense and the fact that the Indian Wars were winding down and the possibility of invasion of the country was receding to insignificance. Liberals are horrified at the implication of the 2nd Amendment. They see everybody and his brother owning F-22s and 105 mm howitzers and blasting away at each other in road rage disputes. Liberals have no God and therefore no morals and no inner controls. To them all extremes are not only thinkable but inevitable if there is not a strong government to keep the people tightly controlled. The first clause, as I have explained many times, merely gives the reasoning for the second clause. It assumes the militia because the militia is all able-bodied men and asserts that for the militia to be effective, which it also assumes to be vital, the RKBA is not to be infringed. It is a stronger prohibition than any of the others because the others all say “Congress shall make no law...” which allows that a state or a city or a Water Control District could make a law. The second says “...shall not be infringed” which allows of no infringement by anybody. If the sheriff says you can’t have a gun he is infringing. He does not get an exemption from infringing. Nor does Mayor Daley or Rudy Giuliani.


139 posted on 04/28/2007 5:03:30 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

I have no G-d, but am full of controls. I don’t get to ask for forgiveness, nor can I depend on faith, sacrifice, pilgrimage, or magic to redeem any mistakes I make.

I agree with your view of the constitution. Further, I don’t see how under the 14th Amendment, the states can claim authority to deny their state citizens/residents rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution.

I don’t see too many people owning F-22s, as they are pretty expensive. Most thugs are less dangerous with fully automatic weapons, as they can’t aim worth crap. As for the 105mm howitzer, they don’t conceal work a hoot, and you need a team of folks to get them to fire, even if you don’t do the “forward observer” routine. Feeding them is a major chore too, which is why the “Caissons go rolling along”.

But boy-howdy, have you seen all the odd kinds of ammunition available for the 12 gauge/18mm smoothbore?


140 posted on 04/30/2007 8:29:41 PM PDT by donmeaker (You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson