Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man not guilty in 'dungeon' rapes
AP via Yahoo ^ | 04/23/07

Posted on 04/23/2007 8:12:01 AM PDT by Abathar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: BJungNan
"Will the girls now be prosecuted for bring false charges?"

You mean like the Duke accuser girl?

81 posted on 04/23/2007 10:19:12 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Per Fox news, the feds will probably also pursue charges of a felon having a gun. If convicted on that count he also faces life in prison because of the 3rd strike.
82 posted on 04/23/2007 10:55:15 AM PDT by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Canali

Here some late news from newswire.

“However, Hinson testified during the six-day trial that the girls had consensual sex with him. He said they made up the story so they would be able to take drugs from the underground room, which he used to store marijuana.

The two young women were not in the courtroom when Hinson was acquitted. Their mothers wept.

If convicted, Hinson had faced a mandatory life sentence without parole under the state’s two-strikes law because he was convicted of raping a 12-year-old girl in 1991.

The underground room was about the length and width of a mid-sized car with a ceiling about 4 1/2 feet high. Hinson testified Sunday that he had built the room over two years.

Defense attorney Rick Hoefer spent 2 hours going over inconsistencies in the case.”

I only know one thing for sure:

If I’m ever accused of a crime, I want that damn defense attorney representing me.


83 posted on 04/23/2007 12:00:21 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
so a guy buying drugs is a trusted witness now?

like I've suspected, many people want the rape victims DEAD before convicting a rapist....the burden of proof is so high....

84 posted on 04/23/2007 12:04:50 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
"There's also no DNA evidence"

the perp ADMITTED to having "sex" with them.....I suppose he left dna.

85 posted on 04/23/2007 12:08:23 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
"There's also no DNA evidence"

the perp ADMITTED to having "sex" with them.....I suppose he left dna.

86 posted on 04/23/2007 12:08:29 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cherry
so a guy buying drugs is a trusted witness now?

Police informants, used every day and not just for the evil weed. Blackbird.

87 posted on 04/23/2007 2:11:51 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST (A vote for rudyputin IS a vote for the hildabeast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Bosco

I guess lots of people have underground bunkers that contain a sexual dungeon where family and friends come over for a few hours of degradation, torture and what-not.

It’s called “Moral Relativism”.

____+___________

No, it is called “San Francisco”...


88 posted on 04/23/2007 2:25:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
That's just where moral relativism is practiced.

Point well made, though.

89 posted on 04/23/2007 2:54:03 PM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
So the kidnap/rape story was bogus. They will probably re-file charges concerning his drug stash...

All right, It's a fair cop...

90 posted on 04/23/2007 11:17:02 PM PDT by MrEdd (Dogs think they're human, Cats think they're Gods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto
No one said you did not have a right to comment on it. That does not mean your comments will be free of challenge. What information do you base your decison on wast he question.
91 posted on 04/24/2007 8:38:43 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
What decision? To think that OJ is guilty? DNA for one.

In the dungeon case, the jury never got to hear that the creep had a previous conviction for rape of a young girl. And other evidence was pretty convincing - the DA summarized it on O'Reilly?? There should be a transcript if you are still interested.

92 posted on 04/25/2007 10:15:41 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto
In the dungeon case, the jury never got to hear that the creep had a previous conviction for rape of a young girl. And other evidence was pretty convincing - the DA summarized it on O'Reilly?? There should be a transcript if you are still interested.

Asked and answered.

93 posted on 04/25/2007 1:43:23 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson