Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

“Mythbusters” proved that a spark of the type described, in exactly the same conditions, would set off a massive explosion. It stunned the guys on “Mythbusters” as to the power of the explosion.

Exact same engineering, design, scale (with less fuel of course)?

Would like to see that show.


15 posted on 04/23/2007 7:24:37 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: PGalt

You know how they do things. It was precise. They used a couple of different voltages/sparks, all within the area of the probable. They heated the remnants inside the tank to exactly the temperature thought to have existed on the tarmac that day.


22 posted on 04/23/2007 7:42:09 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: PGalt
Exact same engineering, design, scale (with less fuel of course)?

In this case, scale matters.

But it's not the explosion of the fuel vapors that I doubt, it's the ignition mechanism.

For instance a missile that missed, and shot hot fragments into that tank, would produce the same explosion. And the tank would be so damaged that the initial penetration would be next to impossible to spot, thats assuming that the explosion didn't form the "into" hole so they looked like "out of" holes, or just rips in the the tank.

I'm not saying that *was* the mechanism, just that absent any other physical evidence, either explanation, spark or hot fragment, works equally well.

47 posted on 04/23/2007 1:56:41 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson