Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DB
I’m not so sure flames could reach and maintain 1,000 feet high. Sounds like the press means to say “really high”, “really, really high”, “the highest we’ve ever seen!” high.

I could be wrong, goodness knows it wouldn’t be the first, or the last time, but that’s awfully high for flames. The fireball from an accumulation of gas might be that high for a moment, but not sustained.

We’ll just have to wait and see.

46 posted on 04/23/2007 6:08:41 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jwparkerjr
I’m not so sure flames could reach and maintain 1,000 feet high.

Here are a couple of links to a gas fire in Chicago in 1998. This fire was fed by a high pressure 24" gas line that was ruptured by construction equipment. It took 30 minutes for the pipeline to shut down and for the residual pressure to escape.

http://www.suntimes.com/realchicago/1990s/13.html

http://www.robotwisdom.com/img2/fire.jpg

58 posted on 04/23/2007 6:48:37 AM PDT by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: jwparkerjr
I’m not so sure flames could reach and maintain 1,000 feet high.

This comes pretty close: Video of Devil's Cigarette Lighter

65 posted on 04/23/2007 7:31:00 AM PDT by rustbucket (E pur si muove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: jwparkerjr

The one mention on ABC radio news said one hundred feet.


75 posted on 04/23/2007 8:59:52 AM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson