Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin

Well right now it doesn’t work that way.

“And if it could?”

Your ‘choice’ is nonsensical and a ‘pipe dream’.

It would never be enacted.

Your way would still give the woman a way out of her MORAL responsibility.

And even IF it was done the way you propose, it’s STILL an abortion.

Because when you terminate the pregnancy, even when the fetus is transferred to another, the biological mothers pregnancy is ABORTED.

It will never pass the abortionists ‘requirements’. Because if that were the case, then carrying the child to term and giving it up to ADOPTION would be on their list.

It’s not. And never will be.


8,528 posted on 04/25/2007 6:55:11 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8521 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2

Pipe dream you say? Many thought the exact same thing about organ transplants. Many once thought that same thing about proving that the Earth was not flat. Many thought that about the plague and polio. Many thought way about man surviving in space.

Your attitude is akin to Harry Reid’s in regards to the War. Defeatist and unable to see or talk about a subject in any other terms than your own view. You are talking to me the same way he talks to the press about W or Dick Cheney.

You speak of MORAL responsibility. Are you saying that Moral responsibility means having a pregnancy go full term where it began or are you saying that when a mother has a child she is bound to raise it? IF the latter applies, cool. Just say that then. I guess you would have to say that adoption is also a violation of that moral responsibility then, right? If the former applies the cool. Just say that then and don’t pretend your postion is about life. You cannot have it ten different ways.

It is now official, I have been told that my position IS abortion and I have also been told it IS NOT....that it is something different. So which is it?

Carrying the child to term for adoption does not address the changes to a female’s body that occur nor the risks of pregnancy itself. Time to be honest with yourself and see that this part of the discussion is simply dismissed by you as if it doesn’t even exist.

If a pregnancy goes to full term, how is the pregnancy itself aborted? It’s NOT. Isn’t that what is important? Have I missed something?


8,703 posted on 04/25/2007 9:40:16 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8528 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson