Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elyse

Hasn’t been invented yet? You say?

Well that is part of searching out NEW ideas....isn’t it?
The only reason you say my coment isn’t about the abortion debate is because you are trying to backtrack about what you said to me in the beginning. My aim is to end abortion as it is today and retain choice at the same time, it is kind of silly to say that what I am talking about has nothing to do with the abortion debate when what I seek is to end the practice as it is done today.

My comment has nothing to do with retaining death of the unborn as a solution, so do please stop saying that to me. It has no merit said towards me or what I said.


8,512 posted on 04/25/2007 6:20:44 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4892 | View Replies ]


bookmarked


8,513 posted on 04/25/2007 6:23:05 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8512 | View Replies ]

To: Just sayin

It’s hard to even understand you. In the abortion debate as it stands right now if you are pro-choice, you are for allowing the mother to decide if she wants to kill the baby or continue her pregnancy. That IS the debate right now - Kill the baby or don’t kill the baby.

You say your aim is to end the debate today and retain choice. So if we end the debate TODAY and retain choice then the mother has the choice to not kill the baby or kill the baby.

It seems like you are saying you want to end the debate today because you believe in the future that a baby can be taken out of the mother and put into another womb which wouldn’t kill the baby. That’s a wonderful idea, but it does nothing to end the debate we are having today on abortion because that option is not available. PLUS, even if that option was available and we retained choice you would have 3 choices instead of two. You could not kill the baby, kill the baby, or give the baby up to someone else’s womb, which would be the same as not killing the baby, but I won’t squabble with you about that.

Even if your option was available today and you gave women the choice between kill the baby, don’t kill the baby and remove the baby to another womb, some women would still choose to kill the baby! So your option does nothing to change the debate on abortion now or in the future.


8,522 posted on 04/25/2007 6:42:02 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8512 | View Replies ]

To: Just sayin

“The only reason you say my coment isn’t about the abortion debate is because you are trying to backtrack about what you said to me in the beginning. My aim is to end abortion as it is today and retain choice at the same time,”


Ponder this, someday science will invent a pill, or something that can be put under the skin, so that females in the most advanced country on earth will forget that unplanned pregnancies were even possible. When that pill that prevents pregnancy is invented, then peace and harmony will reign in America.

I wonder which will arrive first a “birth control pill”, or your solution to abortion of transplanting 1.4 million babies a year into other women (or devices).


8,561 posted on 04/25/2007 7:31:18 AM PDT by ansel12 ((America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8512 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson