Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

By the way, when did abortion become so central to your politics. I don’t recall you mentioning it much before.

And as I noted above, your “mission statement” for FR from 1999 doesn’t even mention it.

In fact, an objective reader could even get the impression that you would oppose laws outlawing abortion since that would entail the government from “interfering.”


7,814 posted on 04/24/2007 4:41:41 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7795 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Hill

“Interfering” is Roe vs Wade.


7,820 posted on 04/24/2007 4:43:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7814 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; Jim Robinson
In fact, an objective reader could even get the impression that you would oppose laws outlawing abortion since that would entail the government from “interfering.”

The Preamble to the Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Our government exists to protect life.

7,824 posted on 04/24/2007 4:45:34 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7814 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
And as I noted above, your “mission statement” for FR from 1999 doesn’t even mention it.

I don't know if that is true or not, but Jim asked a pro-choice person today to read his mission statement. In typical liberal fashion, he said he read it but could not find anything about abortion. They read the Constitution the same way. If it is there, it ain't. If it is, it isn't.

7,849 posted on 04/24/2007 4:55:25 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7814 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
In fact, an objective reader could even get the impression that you would oppose laws outlawing abortion since that would entail the government from “interfering.”

I think you're reaching here Sam. The State has an interest in protecting innocent human life. If not, tehn just what the heck is the purpose of the State? Dominic seemed to think it was all about lower taxes and smaller government. I would hope you would not agree with that small minded notion.

7,853 posted on 04/24/2007 4:58:10 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7814 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; Jim Robinson
And as I noted above, your “mission statement” for FR from 1999 doesn’t even mention it.

Where can we find that mission statement? I've been relying on the one from 2004, which I am happy to see is current, and clearly representative of the way this site is being managed. And yes, it does specify that Free Republic is pro-life.

7,877 posted on 04/24/2007 5:08:49 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Be careful what you ask for, and even more careful what you demand. Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7814 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson