So, I would submit that you're being dishonest in your assertions about your own motives here. You couldn't read that post and give a simple defense of your position.
Dude, I'm *flooded* with posts to respond to. As I said earlier, I apologize in advance if I don't get to answer most of them. For every 1 I post, there are 5 or more new ones!
Besides, I've already said I don't think this is the time or thread for an indepth discussion of abortion. I'm happy to have that one (again), but on another thread, another day.
The topic here is a bit more 'macro' than just abortion, I think.
IMO, he is an extremely dishonest poster and his motives are to see a liberal in the WH come Jan2009. Rudy is his guy!
You're familiar with my posting the analysis and critique of Rudy Giuliani`s final record as Mayor of NYCity. It was created by Edmund J. McMahon of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. After posting it for the last eight months and getting no more then a few futile attempts to refute the facts contained therein. DH comes along and says I'm misrepresenting the facts of the article.
Could he refute the facts as they're listed in the analysis? Of course not. He never even attempted. The good, the bad and the ugly of Rudy`s fiscal record as Mayor of NYCity stands on its own. A record only a liberal could see as a great achievement of fiscal conservatism.