“I want to know...HOW IS RUDY GIULIANI TOUGH ON TERROR?”
That is something I have wondered for a long time. Those who support Giuliani say that the WOT is the most important issue in the upcoming election. We are now 5 1/2 years past September 11, 2001, and most of an entire political party wants to believe that there is no war on terror. So, what exactly is Rudy going to do? What are his plans for dealing with Afghanistan and Iraq? How is he going to handle a nuclear Iran? How is he going to be better, tougher, stronger than the other candidates?
I think the point Rudy-supporters are trying to make is that Rudy is better than Hillary when it comes to prosecuting the WOT, and that only Rudy can actually beat Hillary. According to that logic, if we want to be tough on terror, we MUST elect Rudy, otherwise we'll get Hillary.
Convoluted logic, but it makes sense if you start with the premise that only Rudy can beat Hillary, which most Rudy-supporters ardently believe.