[mkjessup]

"Dr. Haskell went in with forceps and grabbed the baby’s legs and pulled them down into the birth canal. Then he delivered the baby’s body and the arms— everything but the head. The doctor kept the head right inside the uterus. . . .

"The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his little feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors in the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out, like a startle reaction, like a flinch, like a baby does when he thinks he is going to fall.

"The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a highpowered suction tube into the opening, and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby went completely limp. . . ."

A straightforward abortion is MURDER, but anyone, ANYONE who thinks this is a perfectly acceptable medical procedure is a monster on par with Charles Manson

Rudy Giuliani didn't think such a procedure should be banned, he agreed with Bill Clinton in opposing such a ban, but that ban included a provision for protecting the life of the mother (the provision Rudy said a ban had to have), but he opposed it anyway. But now he's trying to wrap himself in the SCOTUS decision last week banning that particular version of infanticide.

Rudy Giuliani is on record as saying that the murder of an unborn 'fetus' (as he insists on calling it) is not as serious as murdering a child that has already been born.

Rudy continues to believe that federal funding should be provided to any woman who is lacking the money necessary to murder her own child in the womb.

Anyone supporting Rudy Giliani is if not endorsing, they are condoning the same murderous policies that would result from him being elected President.

That is the truth, and there is no way to spin it otherwise.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Rudy Giuliani didn't think such a procedure should be banned, he agreed with Bill Clinton in opposing such a ban

Anyone supporting Rudy Giliani is if not endorsing, they are condoning the same murderous policies that would result from him being elected President.

That is the truth, and there is no way to spin it otherwise.

To which I repeat.

ANYONE who thinks this is a perfectly acceptable medical procedure is a monster on par with Charles Manson.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

Good point:

if not endorsing, they are condoning

One cannot be prolife and condone, even silently, abortion, or one ceases to be pro-life. One becomes when-it’s-convenient- for-me-I’m-pro-life. Which means when it’s not, you will favor abortion by sanctioning a pro-abortionist to run the government.

It’s saying, “I personally don’t approve of abortion, but I am hoping this guy will keep the bad guys away, and I’ll sacrifice the unborn in the hopes I can live comfortably.”

That’s only slightly different that saying, “I personally don’t approve of abortion, but I support a woman’s right to choose.”

It’s still sacrificing the unborn for one’s convenience and comfort.

There’s just no getting out of that one.