You confused me and Zeroisanumber. Your post to him #6503:
Your earlier statement that if someone leads you in the wrong direction means they are not a great leader. That is a foolish mindframe. You didn’t like the Hilter reference, which was indeed very appropriate to counter your argument
Zeroisanumber did not make that statement about a wrong direction, I did. Furthermore, Zeroisanumber did not say anything to you about your "Hitler reference," I did. And your Hitler reference and your entire point were ridiculously unnecessary because of the context of the conversation Zeroisanumber and I were having.
Yet in your zeal to pile on with the vitriol and get your jollies (as exemplified here: "I found my first weekend here to be rather interesting to watch (lol). Freepercide...that’s funny."), you couldn't help yourself but tell others who had no interest in what you had to say that they were wrong, and continuing to accuse people of making false statements here when you were already told that you weren't framing the discussion in the proper context.
You could have opposed either your view or his, but didn’t.
Why would I have opposed my view ... and the point of the discussion we were having is that I opposed his view. What are you even talking about?
I even asked you if you disagreed with me.
I've made it abundantly clear that I do.
I even put it into the context you two were discussing.
No, you didn't.
Maybe you just didn’t make your point. I can’t disagree with you because you haven’t said anything.
Maybe you failed to understand the point ... which is: We were talking about leadership in a context that you ignored when you went off praising Hitler's leadership qualities.
Debate your point, or simply don’t answer someone elses post, would be something to consider.
I've debated my point everytime ... feel free to read through my posting history. But don't come butting into my conversations telling me that I'm wrong or how to behave with my posts.
Placeholder.