[Just sayin]

I would hold that side to the same account I hold the other. I tried to show that when I talked about their goal being “not to be pregnant”.

If such an idea as I pondered could be attained, they would have to accept it as the most proper choice for all concerned that gives them what it is they basically seek. If they would not, then they would be wrong imho.

I look at my postion as kind of an technologically advanced version of adoption. Without the physical changes to a female’s body due to a full term pregnancy.

I can respect a female that does not wish to have those changes happen to her body. Could that be considred vain? Absolutely. But I see that as their choice to make and not mine. One they will answer for themselves.

With no lives lost in he process, are not all sets of rights being respected and observed equally? FWIW, That is my aim.

[CharacterCounts]

Perhaps you are arguing on the wrong forum. Freepers are not anti-choice, we are pro-life and against abortion. The whole term pro-choice was inveted by liberal because the couldn’t stand to hear they were pro-abortion.

[LexBaird]

I can respect a female that does not wish to have those changes happen to her body. Could that be considred vain? Absolutely. But I see that as their choice to make and not mine. One they will answer for themselves.

You respect a woman who chooses vanity over life? If her figure is that important, that she would kill for it, why can she not give up sex for it?