I think it is clear from my body of postings that I am a firm believer in dialog, the more the better. I don’t know how you, being familiar with my posting history, would come to a different conclusion, but your opinion is wrong.
I think both sides are talking past each other trying to score points. I think there is some small room for agreement if we didn’t just assume the worst of each other (although I’m seeing less of that possibility given the eye-opening I’m getting from this thread and from going to the WideAwake site and reading stuff there.
I am apparently naive when it comes to politics. I hate politics, I hate how easily so many people can just lie to your face as a matter of strategy, or be completely disingenous about why they support people.
Anyway, I just wanted to counter your opinion. Feel free to believe what you want, and I’ll continue to try to have reasoned discussions of the issues and the policies of the candidates.
What is the WideAwake site?
(sorry, it’s a looooong thread! lol)