To: Finny
Rudy Arnold would be worse. He's not a fraud, he's mostly liberal. He'd do what Jim Robinson eloquently describes -- deeply erode the main-message Republican values. They're values that appeal to thousands of Democrats who don't know that they're really Republicans, but they know what they like when the see it. Republicans don't need to go left to win.
Arnold is doing exactly what we all fear Rudy would do, exactly what you described that Rudy would do. I would rather have California destroyed by a Democrat, instead of a Democrat who is disguised as a Republican.
BTW, I really think McClintock would have beaten Cruz BustaMeCHa handily, which is why Arnold got into the race to begin with.
285 posted on
04/21/2007 7:53:17 PM PDT by
rottndog
(American First, Conservative Second, Republican Increasingly Reluctantly...)
To: rottndog
BTW, I really think McClintock would have beaten Cruz BustaMeCHa handily, which is why Arnold got into the race to begin with... No way. NO WAY would Tom McClintock have beaten Bustamante. I know CA voters.
To: rottndog
I disagree. California is not the United States. It’s big and important, but not that big and important.
900 posted on
04/21/2007 10:24:58 PM PDT by
Finny
(God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson