The one that cures cancer, judging by the major contemporary medical researchers, is likely to have IQ >160. Murray and Herrnstein [”Bell Curve”, 1994] traced, among other things, the background of such children. The way the things are, his mother, being smart enough, would not need to have an abortion - she is already planning and timing her children, and knows how to use the contraceptives. The one who will cure cancer will be a desired, wanted child. [with probability 99+%]. His being desired and wanted will contribute to the parental care and involvement in his growing up, propelling him to the full realization of his IQ. The same, but with different probabilities [not 99+ but 80-90%} could be repeated about the future businessman.
Seriously, you are creepy. You could make the same argument to support eugenics. You obviously don’t care one bit about human life and are perfectly willing to see those whom you even think might be potential welfare users butchered. Ghoulish, inhumane, the adjectives go on and on...
“The one who will cure cancer will be a desired, wanted child. [with probability 99+%]”
Then don’t stop at your desire to pay for abortions. Let’s sterilize all of the blacks, latinos, and whites and keep only asians and jews. There are of higher IQ by statistical standards and would provide a much higher standard of living.
Explain Beethoven.