Replies

While you are using hyperbole to make your point, which you pretty much admitted prior to making it, I believe your example to be an apt one. The lesser of two evils is still evil. And nowhere in my Bible do I find any excuse for supporting evil in any way, shape or form. Stand for what's right, and leave the consequences to God. That's my philosophy, and I think it jives with the founders'.

That is exactly the approach that conservatives should take in regards to the choices they make regarding our elected officials and those who would seek to lead us.

If something is evil, it is evil. There is no distinction between (for example) those who physically shoved Jews into the gas ovens, and those who managed the death camps. No difference between the Nazi thug who clubbed an innocent Jew to death on the street, and the well mannered Dr. Megele' who conducted medical experiments on Jews before they were murdered. The net result is the same. Evil is evil.

In the upcoming primaries and general election, Americans will have a choice, they can either condone the infanticidal views of the likes of Rudy Giuliani and/or Hillary Clinton, or they can emulate Nancy Reagan and "just say NO" to such pro-abortionist candidates. As already pointed out, if such a candidate ends up being elected anyway, that is the fault of the political organization that promoted them, not the voters who retain a conscience, who still embrace human decency and morality.

It may well turn out to be America's fate that a liberal, gun-grabbing abortionist will win the Presidency in 2008, but if that happens, it will not be the fault of conservatives who refuse to 'go along to get along', it will be because one or both major Parties sold out their voters, and sold out America by trying to foist such amoral individuals upon our society.