Well stated!
Imagine if the court interpretation was consistent...
Freedom of speech work require the government to suppress speech on public property.
Freedom of the press would forbid the press to report from public property.
The absurdity of such rulings would be seen by all but somehow the Court misses the irony of using the freedom of religion amendment to restrict religious freedom in public.
I apologize for thread diversion and I’ll stop now - its just that this topic is beyond a pet peeve of mine.