“I agree,ban me next.I am coming closer to the light.will pass word out .”
This is the exact scenario that plays out. People hearing about all of the “bannings”, and then they add themselves to the list by their choice. We’ll people will now be saying that you were banned. Will you tell people that you were banned or will you tell them you asked to be banned?
I truely am curious, as I’ve read from the absolute beginning of the thread, and there’s been some people listing their friends names in their post and saying “these were my friends”. And I’m sitting back and thinking, yes, and each one of them specifically asked to be banned.
jedward, no. Don’t even go there. I know you’re new here so you don’t know the kind gentle lady fatima is. She’s hurting because of this thread and watching what’s gone on...she’s a GOOD and DECENT lady.
She will NOT head over to another site. This is a completely different situation here...
Your noob-ness is showing.
fatima’s awesome.
*Nite: Blog piece, OP/Pundit Only
April 25, 2007
Giuliani talks tough on terror, Dems fire back
~snip~
It will be interesting to see if any Republicans challenge Giuliani directly about his stance on terrorism and his actions before and after 9/11. It would be a risky strategy for a Republican because they would risk alienating the very voters they need in the upcoming presidential primaries. But if the GOP contenders don’t start hitting Giuliani soon they’ll be in serious trouble.
And attacking a candidate’s perceived strength is straight from the GOP playbook. Supporters of President Bush adroitly turned John Kerry’s Vietnam service into a liability when the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” questioned his war record and the Kerry campaign failed to immediately respond to the group’s claims that many people, including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said were
“dishonest and dishonorable.”
~snip~
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/seattlepolitics/category.asp?blogID=37&category=440
Freepmail...I’ll explain.
Do not go there. Are you serious or just a troll?