Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-386 next last
To: Jim Robinson
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that? A RESOUNDING NO on both counts. Let's join together for Conservatism and a Conservative Candidate. Let's not settle for what the media/social intelligentsia want us to settle for.
28 posted on
04/21/2007 6:51:30 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Jim Robinson
I know you to be a loyal Republican. The fact that Rudy is affecting you and other loyalists this way tells me that for the first time in modern politics, the GOP runs the risk of allowing a true third party threat to take shape in 2008. They won’t be able to win but it will ensure a Hillary presidency. She must be loving the idea of a Rudy nomination.
32 posted on
04/21/2007 6:52:14 PM PDT by
streetpreacher
(What if you're wrong?)
To: KATIE-O
You should reconsider your support for a socialist like Guiliani.
33 posted on
04/21/2007 6:52:31 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Jim Robinson
Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate? In the latest FR poll, Giuliani is only getting about 6-7% of members' opinion. The vast majority of us are NOT on board with Rudy the RINO. I would vote third party before I would vote for a pro-abort, pro-homo candidate who doesn't understand the Constitution.
36 posted on
04/21/2007 6:53:13 PM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Constitutional and social conservative)
To: Jim Robinson
Do you really expect me to do that?No! Nor will I!!!
38 posted on
04/21/2007 6:53:43 PM PDT by
Inyo-Mono
(If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
To: Jim Robinson
Despite the global warming B.S., hell has yet to freeze over, so NO, Rudi does not get my vote. Only when hell has frozen over will Rudi, McScream or any other Marxist LIBERAL get my vote!!!
40 posted on
04/21/2007 6:54:04 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(America has lost its mind and is on its last days as a free country & Republic.)
To: Jim Robinson
"Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party? Do you really expect me to do that?"Well......you supported Arnold over the Conservative McClintock. So I'll believe it when I see it.
41 posted on
04/21/2007 6:54:19 PM PDT by
Godebert
To: Jim Robinson
Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party if?
That barn door has been opened
Just depends on how mamy d'rats and RINO's can get in before conservatives shut the door
46 posted on
04/21/2007 6:55:14 PM PDT by
Popman
(New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
To: Jim Robinson
47 posted on
04/21/2007 6:55:34 PM PDT by
Enosh
(†)
To: Jim Robinson
Do you really expect me to do that?No way! I would expect you to keep up the good fight!
Thanks for the encouraging post. It has been quite alarming to me how many self-proclaimed conservatives are willing to sacrifice their deeply held beliefs and principles to support a candidate that is more palatable to the left. I just don't understand that at all.
48 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:06 PM PDT by
Shelayne
To: Jim Robinson
At this point it’s Fred for me. He’s electable, and he seems to pass Ronald Reagan’s 80% rule.
49 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:17 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: merry10
52 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:33 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
( Duncan Hunter '08)
To: Jim Robinson
“Do you think I’m going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?”
I’m with ya!
I also see your concern of Demoncrats in drag pretending to be Republicans ... using the scare tactic of “want Hillary in there”? LOL! NOW is the time to weed out the Demoncrats in drag posing as Republicans and clean up the cultural and moral debauchery that the Rudy’s and McPain's of the world promote.
Hopefully Fred will run!
53 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:37 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Jim Robinson
Watch out Jim the rudy bots will get you banned.
54 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:41 PM PDT by
VaRepublican
(I would propagate tag lines but I don't know how...)
To: Jim Robinson
No way would I vote for him even if he was the nominee.
I’m with Thompson.
55 posted on
04/21/2007 6:56:56 PM PDT by
netmilsmom
(To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
To: Jim Robinson
Do you really expect me to do that?
Me? No.
However I'm not one of those trying to redefine conservatism into some bastard hybrid of libertarianism and old school marxism.
They, well yeah, they expect you to STFU and get your head right or suffer the consequences.
57 posted on
04/21/2007 6:57:14 PM PDT by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Jim Robinson
If we must set up a third party and run a Ronald Reagan type candidate, so be it. Voting for Rudy would probably be worse than pulling the lever for Hillary/Obama/Silky Pony, since his win would have the imprimatur of the so-called “conservative” GOP and he would face less opposition in leading the country further towards socialism.
To: Jim Robinson
Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Rock on you crazy diamond!
60 posted on
04/21/2007 6:57:43 PM PDT by
Vision
("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
To: Jim Robinson
And should he get the nomination anyways do you forfeit your duty and honor and stay home instead of voting, thus clearing the path for a marxist to do all those things to the country with the backing of the congress and the courts?
I still can't fathom the idea of not supporting a candidate who goes the right way half the time over a candidate who does none of the time.
I don't support Rudy, but I'll vote for him if I have to just to keep a true 100% socialist out of the White House. Call me a political prostitute, but I still believe in the America I remember and the democrats will take that away from me.
61 posted on
04/21/2007 6:57:53 PM PDT by
infidel29
(...but sir, if my child had a fever I wouldn't go to a bureaucrat for the diagnosis.)
To: Jim Robinson
Unless we subscribe to radically different definitions of “socialism” [on the basis of my experiences in USSR of accursed memory I would associate it with the leftist collectivism; although the not-so-leftist Nazis also used “socialist” in their name - so it probably needs to be associated with collectivism pure and simple]- so, unless you happen to use some different definition of what ‘socialism”/”socialist” means, I find it implausible to associate Rudy with the meaning of ‘socialism” I learned by my own skin while living under it. His known position on taxation, for example, is diametrically opposite to collectivist levelling/redistribution mantra. Socialism is hillary’s “we are going to take your things away for the common good”. Rudy’s [past] experience with NYC taxes would mark him as anti-socialist, IMHO.
62 posted on
04/21/2007 6:57:57 PM PDT by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-386 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson