Skip to comments.
Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?
vanity
| April 21, 2007
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 5,361-5,380, 5,381-5,400, 5,401-5,420 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
To: Registered
Yeah, well, my weapon of choice is not money. We’ll be knocking him out with his own words and deeds.
To: 68 grunt; Jim Robinson; EternalVigilance
“Get a wee bit a credibility back and maybe we can be a wee bit of power back and maybe we can influence the primary a wee bit.”
Jim, the grunt thinks FR needs a wee bit more credibility. I disagree. However, if you zot this grunt now, the credibility of FR will go through the roof, and the sounds of thunderous applauds will follow.
5,382
posted on
04/23/2007 2:59:01 PM PDT
by
dmw
(Conservatives do NOT vote for liberals.)
To: Politicalmom
Great Reagan quotes PoliticalMom. Outstanding!
5,383
posted on
04/23/2007 2:59:29 PM PDT
by
rbmillerjr
("Message to radical jihadis...come to my hood, it's understood ------ it's open season" Stuck Mojo)
To: 68 grunt
You've been able to see the obvious devil, Rudybots, social moderates, et-al, but you've failed to see the phony Archie Bunkers. The uber-conservatives, direct for DU or move-on or just punk assed liberals wanting to hurt our cause. Yeah, sure. We'll all pitch in and send you a case of Reynolds Wrap.
5,384
posted on
04/23/2007 3:00:53 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: jla
BTW, since you didn't quote what I said, here is what I original said about this, in it's entirety:
Mia T. posted a vanity thread where she claimed that if we dont vote for Rudy, the blood of all the dead babies would be on our hands. Then she said Fred was a globalist DC politician who couldnt be trusted. It turned out she had posted two other vanity-style threads this month attacking Fred. In one she said denounced his lack of experience while completely ignoring his senate career, and in the other she claimed he was deceiving us and running just to help McCain. She linked both of those into her what is pro-life thread, hijacking and spamming her own thread. And she made two posts that were so bad she deleted them.
That is what got her banned.
as everybody can see, I don't claim that her two posts deleted got her banned, I said the entirety of that exchange, of which the two deleted comments were part, is what got her banned.
And as everybody can see, my characterization of her posts is spot-on, and in fact is not like what you mischaracterized MY comments as. Your claims about what I said were inaccurate, and your claims about what Mia did were inaccurate.
But more importantly, anybody reading my paragraph (posted long ago in this thread to peach in an attempt to explain the two bannings I knew about) can see I wasn't attacking Mia, I was simply trying to summarize briefly what happened in the thread in which she was banned. It wasn't an attack, I didn't argue against her points, I was just trying to be helpful.
Apparently you didn't find it helpful, but to jump to calling me a liar over it shows what I mean about how we have lost civility. You read what I wrote, you jumped to conclusions about why I wrote it, you decided I was a bad person, and you posted back calling me a liar and a coward.
So instead of allowing for a civil discussion of the matter which might clear up misunderstanding, your response was meant only to provoke argument and bad feelings.
fortunately, I think I was able to determine the basis of your complaints, and deal with the substantive issues involved, without resorting to a tit-for-tat personal barrage of insults.
I hope we can all learn from this, and see a way clear to discussing issues and disagreements civilly, and without personal attacks and insults.
To: Luke21
I saw it. Great minds, yada, yada, yada, but you were first and I forgot to spell check.
5,386
posted on
04/23/2007 3:01:10 PM PDT
by
garv
(Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
To: Jim Robinson
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?Jim, I love ya, guy.
5,387
posted on
04/23/2007 3:01:19 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: processing please hold
Yes we will have to have sponsors! So as yours i am obligated to say...LOG OFF NOW! lol!!
Actually id make a terrible sponsor, id be too soft! I know, we can nag each other, then feel guilty cuz we are still online and then split a cheesecake;)
5,388
posted on
04/23/2007 3:01:50 PM PDT
by
OMalley
(Just say NO to Rudy "Tootsie" Giuliani-GO Duncan Hunter 08:))
To: Politicalmom
To: Politicalmom
I really like that second passage.
5,390
posted on
04/23/2007 3:01:50 PM PDT
by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: Politicalmom; Gelato
AWESOME post!
A real keeper.
5,391
posted on
04/23/2007 3:02:25 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness)
To: Jim Robinson; All
As someone who came here when it was "Whitewater", and was more interested in rooting out Clintoniod corruption then advancing a theocon social agenda, it is time for me to depart.
Thanks for the many hours of entertainment...although I really should not be thanking you, but the many posters (most of whom now banned or moved on) that actually created something interesting; something of value and merit.
Now, for the most part, the forum has degenerated into a noise chamber, filled with sound and fury, yet signifying absolutely nothing. Please make sure you remind the sane world that you have nothing to do with the Republican Party, do not endorse the Republican Party, and have mostly Democrat operatives and 3rd Party Cranks as members. And anyone still here that that hasn't yet completely lost their marbles---hang onto your wallets!
Oh, and one last thing....
"Up Yours, Asswipe!"
5,392
posted on
04/23/2007 3:02:29 PM PDT
by
motzman
(R U D Y --- 2 0 0 8)
To: Jim Robinson
Yeah, well, my weapon of choice is not money. Well be knocking him out with his own words and deeds.
That's extremely insightful.
Go ahead and check for mine after the reports are filed.
5,393
posted on
04/23/2007 3:02:31 PM PDT
by
Registered
(Politics is the art of the possible)
To: motzman
I presume that was your opus.
To: Jim Robinson
Laugh away. Were he not a demoncrap operative he wouldn’t be so purposely divisive. Deep cover around here is achieved when some newbie joins each of his posts are Norman Lear Archie Bunker quotes. Do you think Norman Lear was trying to do conservatives a favor when he created that stereotypical caricature?
5,395
posted on
04/23/2007 3:04:48 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: motzman; CharlesWayneCT
Charles, I think it’s safe to add motzman to the list.
5,396
posted on
04/23/2007 3:05:10 PM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Mojave
To: Tennessee Nana
"If a vote for him (Rudy)is necessary to keep the White House in Republican hands, then we don't need the White House this go around.." With respect, that's an incredibly naive statement...I'll cite you ONE reason why, among many...the 3-4 SCOTUS justices that the next president...I gather you don't care if it's Hillary or Obama...will get to appoint...you can look for the recent decision upholding the ban on PBAs to be overturned...
To: motzman
“Up Yours, Asswipe!”
Oh yeah, the Stankees and the Football Giants are the wipers of ass.
Now enjoy your soon to be Gary Hart Rudy liberal loony tunes.
5,399
posted on
04/23/2007 3:07:06 PM PDT
by
rbmillerjr
("Message to radical jihadis...come to my hood, it's understood ------ it's open season" Stuck Mojo)
To: CharlesWayneCT
kevkrom saw the posts. If there was anything significant in those posts, kevkrom would have said so.
Moreover, if those deletions were the ‘banning offense,’ Mia T would have been banned AT THAT POINT. She was not. You are ridiculous.
If there was any connection to the deletions, it is this: Mia T’s and kevkrom’s requests for the deletions brought the controversial thread to the attention of the people who make the decisions to ban. There you have it. The connection.
Now to your silly statement about hypothetical argument. It makes my point. Hang it up, already. You are not helping your cause.
Cut your losses, get some gumption and debate someone who can actually answer you.
5,400
posted on
04/23/2007 3:07:08 PM PDT
by
jla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 5,361-5,380, 5,381-5,400, 5,401-5,420 ... 18,461-18,471 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson