Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"A friend should be one in whose understanding and virtue we can equally confide, and whose opinion we can value at once for its justness and its sincerity. He who has made the acquisition of a judicious and sympathizing friend may be said to have doubled his mental resources." - Robert Hall
Morning. This thread is still going, wow.
I’ll have to work to find a good quote back! ;)
It’s still going strong...
There are plenty of barking (or should I say howlin) moonbat longtime FReepers, well not so many as last week or even yesterday, and by your tone, well, we'll likely be short another few soon enough. It's easy to masquerade as a Conservative, the tough part is maintaining the lie. Thanks for playing. Give 'em hell EV. Blackbird.
There’s no difference between Rudy’s position on the WOT on all the other candidates.
Second, we should nominate Rudy for head of Homeland Security if that is his strength. We don’t need him to be president.
Third, there is no evidence Rudy is a shoo-in to win NY, NJ or California. The DBM will highlight his corruption ties and flip-flops. Dems will paint him as a wild eyed liberal in the Red States, and as a too tough, arrogant, fascists in the blue states.
Fourth, if Rudy was so popular in NY, he would've ran for Governor or Senator. He barely won reelection as Mayor, and is extremely unpopular with NYC minorities.
He has no connection with Hispanics. Hey, vote for the NYC elitist, who is for abortion, Gay rights, and free trade with Cuba. Yeah, that will draw the Hispanics in!
Like I said, Rudy for Homeland Security, not POTUS.
There’s no difference between Rudy’s position on the WOT on all the other candidates.
Second, we should nominate Rudy for head of Homeland Security if that is his strength. We don’t need him to be president.
Third, there is no evidence Rudy is a shoo-in to win NY, NJ or California. The DBM will highlight his corruption ties and flip-flops. Dems will paint him as a wild eyed liberal in the Red States, and as a too tough, arrogant, fascists in the blue states.
Fourth, if Rudy was so popular in NY, he would've ran for Governor or Senator. He barely won reelection as Mayor, and is extremely unpopular with NYC minorities.
He has no connection with Hispanics. Hey, vote for the NYC elitist, who is for abortion, Gay rights, and free trade with Cuba. Yeah, that will draw the Hispanics in!
Like I said, Rudy for Homeland Security, not POTUS.
There’s no difference between Rudy’s position on the WOT on all the other candidates.
Second, we should nominate Rudy for head of Homeland Security if that is his strength. We don’t need him to be president.
Third, there is no evidence Rudy is a shoo-in to win NY, NJ or California. The DBM will highlight his corruption ties and flip-flops. Dems will paint him as a wild eyed liberal in the Red States, and as a too tough, arrogant, fascists in the blue states.
Fourth, if Rudy was so popular in NY, he would've ran for Governor or Senator. He barely won reelection as Mayor, and is extremely unpopular with NYC minorities.
He has no connection with Hispanics. Hey, vote for the NYC elitist, who is for abortion, Gay rights, and free trade with Cuba. Yeah, that will draw the Hispanics in!
Like I said, Rudy for Homeland Security, not POTUS.
;-)
If we couldn't do that, this thread would have 150 posts instead of 15,000.
Doh! You caught me. After 9 years, I thought I had you all fooled, but not you and your eagle - er, Blackbird - eye.
I share your concern and disgust.
As long as our Government is administered for the good of the people, and is regulated by their will; as long as it secures to us the rights of person and of property, liberty of conscience and of the press, it will be worth defending—Andrew Jackson
My trip to Boise was long but great. Got work to do today.
My posting history is there for you to see until I get banned,and I think you will mostly find it full of good humor.I have over the years gotten many personal notes from people telling me I made them laugh.
But now I am angry, and you and your like minded sycophants are most deserving of that anger.What has happened here is a travesty and you are the fools and do not have a clue.
I'm with you woofie. I'm at work today and have to hit the road for a job, otherwise I stay and join you in your dissent of the purge.
Too many very good people have been banned because they took issue, most in a respectful way, with the new order here on FR. An unfortunately I'm not liking what I'm seeing with them. No more room for respectful dissent here. If you do, you're gone. 50 (+ or - a few) bannings of many of those who I've grown to respect with the thoughtfulness of their posts and support of conservatives. We're not all of one mind though we agree on most things here. And to be accused of being a troll or worse for posting a dissenting opinion is not what I expected FR to become. It's too bad that intolerance has become the norm here.
That was Cromwell?
Then there’s “Praise the Lord, but pass the ammunition....”
Hope next time you get down to Boise, we’ll have time to talk!
God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.—Daniel Webster
I agree. I posted some on this thread when it was still in the hundreds. It was sickening, to me, to see the glee with which some people were rejoicing in the bannings (especially those who have been here just a few days and, most likely, would have been zotted for the kinds of stuff they’ve said had they said it a year ago).
I don’t know that I have any FRiends here, per se, but people whose opinions I’ve respected over the years. I’m going to miss them very much on this forum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.