Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
That would be me... But I said it after your post, not before.
I do believe that Rudy is more dangerous than Hilary, because all of the republicans would oppose Hilary’s liberal policies and she would need a veto proof vote. Many republicans would go along with liberal Rudy Fruity.
My daughter was born in California. I lived there three times and was a disc jockey in the San Joaquin Valley in the 1970’s. I’ve posted facts and you’ve posted opinions.
Reagan was no liberal. But your boy Giuliani sure is.
Awww ... feeling the sting of truth with that one?
Just curious, do you disagree that Rudy holds those positions, or, is it that you think there is much more to the man, so simply stating those five positions doesn't accurately define him?
Oooh, another good one.
I see management doesn't mind those people. It's the people who happen to support a Republican they don't like they attack. Sure -- that makes sense. /s
Not at all. I’m just thinking since this is the new accepted language here on Free Republic that I’d try it out.
Sure you will. Plug your ears and don’t listen to what your man has said and done and is still saying today. It’s a classic example.
What are we talking about here? Half an abortion? 30% of an abortion?
“Even Newt has called it one of the greatest urban achievements of the 21st century.”
As far as I know and remember, he was the greatest Mayor that New York City (The Capitol of the World) ever had.
Giuliani ain’t no nobody, or he wouldn’t be the focus of this thread, but if the issue is furthering our conservative hopes for our nation, he is opposed to our goals, and his strengths, define the threat.
There is a precedent for that with W. Most of FR supported the medicare plan, no child left behind, etc. etc. Just because we had a Republican president.
Actually, I am very happy about this thread because it suggests we have learned from that mistake.
Rudy is moderating his policy on abortion and has talked about states right.”
Duh ya Peach, He wants to be President and he wants your vote and he will say anything you want to hear to get it.
The latter.
I appreciate your civil question.
“Wow Reagan Man chill, your starting to sound like Stalin.”
Drop the hyperbole pal. Stalin would take you out and shoot you. This is just debate on a political board. I get tired of all the people who drag Hitlers and Stalins out every time their side is losing an argument.
No kidding? Gosh, the things you learn on Free Republic.
I’ve only mentioned 2-3 times upthread that when Reagan was a Democrat and then Republican and pro choice and then pro life, he was embraced. Now when Republicans moderate their views more toward our liking, we call it pandering.
See my post 1472.
My tagline during the 2004 election was, "If President Bush loses this election because of his stand on abortion, he is still the winner". I felt that way then, and I still feel that way now.
9 posted on 02/07/2007 12:47:23 PM CST by Texagirl4W (Jesus came to forgive sin, not to accept sin.) *
I get tired of all the people who drag Hitlers and Stalins out every time their side is losing an argument.
Godwin’s law lol.
You must have some file, Rex!
“I hope you’re out looking for a post that backs this up:
Like the time you insinuated that I was on drugs and gay because I dared disagree with the miers pick.
I’m gonna need a link from you to back that up. “
If the thread is still around and didn’t get deleted (last I remember it was in the smoky backroom, irrc) I’ll find it.
Does this ring a bell - you tried to equate me with anderson cooper, because you like to make jokes about anderson cooper being gay. Yes, it was a fun time all around - you resorting to your little attacks.
Gosh, it is late. I’m hitting the hay. Take care, all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.