Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[steve86]

Anybody watched the “White Chicks and Gang Signs” video on Youtube? Fairly tasteful, actually.

[gpapa]

How is anyone here at FR a “like minded sycophant.” We are conservatives who are promoting the same goals put forth in the Republican party platform. Conservatives are not broken glass Republicans. On the contrary we believe in conservatism in all its facits, foreign affairs, economic, fiscal, cultural, etc. If you read the 2006 Republican platform you will see what I mean.

As far as the “fight” is occuring here it is a competition of conservative ideas with liberal ideals. To be sure the arguments are heated, as they are in many political debates. If you are not comfortable with the tone of this debate you are free to go elsewhere where you might be more comfortable. Its a free country, and at least for now, in an open Internet, your choice is as good as mine.

[IrishRainy]

Slow night?

[dixiechick2000]

“Really? That’s too funny!”

It is?

I thought everyone knew that.

[staytrue]

All conservatives are republicans, and at the moment, most conservatives are Republicans.

You are an idiot aren't you.

[IrishRainy]

Who is that?

[Lando Lincoln]

You know what, I thought I was done for the night. But you don’t know and, in fact, can’t know what I have said over there. Most has been by internal mail. I have only expressed sadness and regret about this purge. Here and “over there”. Good Lord, stop being an insecure paranoid poster, my FRiend. Now. I’ve known you otherwise. And I have not attacked you or anyone specifically. Please stop. With that, my friendly pillow awaits. Tomorrow, the next day and the one after that, I hope we have friendlier discourse. I promise to start anew. Good Night.

[EternalVigilance]

Why do you say so? My comment is objectively true.

[IrishRainy]

That just might be the funniest post I’ve ever seen on FR.

You definitely need to get out more, then.

[BykrBayb]

I read that they were putting their anti-freeper threads out in the open where everyone could read them, until they discovered one of them had been posted here. (If it was, I missed it.) Supposedly that’s when they confined their anti-freeping to the private chat room.

[EternalVigilance]

You definitely need to get out more, then.

Yeah, maybe I do. It gets a little close in here with you trolls.

[NautiNurse]

Who got zotted (besides Howlin) that has you attacking so shrilly like Rosie?

The recent zots have not impacted my disposition one way or another, albeit they have made you euphoric and reckless. I am only responding in kind to your insults and bullying. Nothing more, nothing less. Put that on your naked profile page.

[conservative in nyc]

So now you’re saying that the direction FR has taken in the last week or so caused freepers to join an anti-freeper site over a month ago? You’re still not making any sense.

Many of the posters on WideAwakes have joined fairly recently. That forum was pretty slow before this thread began. It has picked up steam over the past week. That's a fact. Darwin Central has also picked up users and viewers, largely thanks to the publicity given to that site on this thread. I never knew that site existed before someone mentioned it here.

Could you be the first established freeper I’ve come across who doesn’t know what an anti-freeper is? No, I’ve seen others, but they were all anti-freepers. Even if you’ve never heard of one, a basic understanding of the English language should help you to figure it out.

I can't say that I've heard the term until this week. I thought it had some sort of special meaning I didn't know about, not the plain English meaning it should have. It turns out that some here seem to think "anti-FReeper" means FReepers or former FReepers who post on websites that those FReepers don't like.

[Interesting Times]

Now you’re being lame and silly.

No, no... that's not how you professionally duck a question. You answer a slightly different question; one that you're more comfortable addressing. You don't seriously think I'm going to be distracted with "so's your old man" insults, do you?

Personally, I can't consider supporting Keyes for (whatever) public office until he shows he can attract and retain capable shills. I'm astonished that your superiors haven't realized that your behavior here during the past week is more devastating to Keyes' ability to recruit at FR than anything his enemies could have devised.

Well, okay, maybe I'm not that astonished.

We will now return to our regularly scheduled agitprop. Ta ta for now...

[conservative in nyc]

“What makes WideAwakes an anti-FReeper site or the new Clown Posse?”

Because of the management, and the fact that they have a “secret room.”

MadIvan is now a persona non grata here? I thought his account was still open? And Howlin wasn't purged until this morning.

WideAwakes wouldn't be the first forum with a "secret room".

[BykrBayb]

Well, that is what anti-freepers claim it means.

[gpapa]

BTW, some of those Freepers are still posting here. Nothing wrong with that either. Its a free country.

[Allegra]

Like who? Who would be missed?

Well, with that attitude, I can pretty much say you wouldn't.

I'm not going to fall into the name-game trap. It's a matter of personal opinion. Just because mine doesn't match yours does not make it wrong.

Cheers. ;-)

[dixiechick2000]

Frankly, I’ve always enjoyed Mad Ivan, and his posts.
And, I was on his ping list.

“WideAwakes wouldn’t be the first forum with a “secret room”.”

Of course they aren’t.
BUT...WHY would any forum feel the need for a “secret room?”

[EternalVigilance]

*Yawn*

Have a nice evening.