Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Looks like we're gonna need a bigger zapper!
Here’s my standard challenge to rudybots who post that false dilemma. Skywarner, please answer it or stop posting your rude false dilemma in support of tootyfruityrudy.
As a freeper I am disappointed that there are fans of a liberal presidential candidate trying to push socially liberal views on this socially conservative forum. In particular, I have noticed that the Rudy G fans do not answer posts questioning the qualitative substance of their candidate, or the posts are met merely with insults. And in short, I have noticed that rudy followers are simply rude.
Hildebeast is eminently beatable, this nonsense about rudy being the only one who can beat her is horse manure and impolite on this socon forum. For example, this article:
Long Shot GOP Candidate Brownback Just Five Points Behind Clinton
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1798666/posts
We know that it simply means its very early in the race and that even no-name candidates are only 5 points behind Clinton. So the rudybots should stop supporting a social liberal on this social conservative forum and pick a real winner, rather than a ridiculous loser liberal like rudy.
The 2 polls on Free Republic put forth an obvious SOCON (only Hunter fits that description given) versus a SOLIB (it certainly fits rudy).
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=171
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=172
Rudy splits the base.
I have noticed time and again that rudy supporters rudely send up the false dilemma of who would you vote for, Hildebeast or Rudy. This particularly impolite at this early of a point in the primary cycle. Since this is a socon forum (not even a GOP forum), it is very impolite to ask double-bind questions, especially this early in the race.
Since team rudy is so fond of its own false dilemma, I would expect them to answer this false dilemma.
My contention: If rudy gets the nomination, he splits the base, possibly splits the republican party, and loses the election.
Rudy followers contention: If Hunter gets it, he wins the base and loses the election.
Hypothetical to answer the rudy followers hypothetical. Both sides losing to Hillary.
Side A: The solib republican splits the base. The MSM turns on him the moment he is nominated. Hillary wins. Republican party is split.
Side B: The socon republican wins the nomination, loses to hildebeast in a tough fight. Republicans are united against the hillary presidency.
Which candidate is best for the republican party, Side A or Side B?
Win-Win false dilemma:
Side A: Solib wins presidency by ignoring the socon base and permanently splitting the republican party.
Side B: SoCon wins presidency by (obviously) relying on the socon base.
Which candidate is best for the republican party, Side A or Side B?
Regardless of who wins or loses, Free Republic and the republican party is better off with Duncan Hunter than Rudy as the candidate. This social liberal candidate is simply not healthy for the republican party nor for FR. And rudy followers are proving to be very impolite freepers.
Duncan Hunters campaign website
http://www.gohunter08.com/
LOL...
Nah. Just clean out the tray once in awhile. :-)
If there ever was a Constitutional conservative, its Alan Keyes.
Make the time to check out this entire thread. All the posts. Its conservative, its entertaining, its real, and its LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!
marking my place. This is like a mini-series. Post 11757
I wasn’t here at the time. In fact, I never knew this forum existed. But, I wanted Terry to be saved. It was crushing knowning that this woman was dying, and nothing could be done. We were all powerless except for a few creep judges and a man not fit to be called her husband. I wish I had been here at the time to help fight for Terry. Hopefully we will never have to deal with such a situation again, though.
I was actually looking for the Wicked Witch of the East with Dorothy's house dropped on her and the ruby slippers.
Couldn't find it.
I’ve always felt that Keyes speaks the truth.
:-)
He's alread joined WA a couple of days ago. He’s looking to be zotted so he can go back over there and pretend he's a victim of the "purge". The zapper machine is gonna get him good!
Like I said ... read her last 50 posts and get back to me.
Great hypotheticals, Kevmo! I agree 100%
Still a ton of questions about his abortion position and other important things, as well.
Here's Thompson's position on abortion.
THOMPSON: Pro-life.
WALLACE: Do you want to overturn Roe vs. Wade?
THOMPSON: I think Roe vs. Wade was bad law and bad medical science. And the way to address that is through good judges. I don't think the court ought to wake up one day and make new social policy for the country. It's contrary to what it's been the past 200 years. We have a process in this country to do that. Judges shouldn't be doing that. That's what happened in that case. I think it was wrong.
You said there is "a ton of questions about his abortion position..."
What is the problem? What is the "ton of questions about Fred and his abortion position"?
You were not trying to be humorous. If you were it was to my expense. My husband would agree. Ok. Is that the answer you wanted.Another poster did recognize this also. It was not nice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.