[Lee'sGhost]

“Your analogy isn’t reasonable or sensible so you fall back on simple self-assertion and violence.”

It’s an analogy. It’s not meant to be perfect but to illustrate.

What makes no sense is your comment above. Neither I nor the CSA “fell back on self-assertion (simple or otherwise) and violence” because of my analogy — as your comment states.

If you want to criticize someone I would suggest that your criticism make sense or else you’ll come off looking like an ass. But that's just me.

[stand watie]

WELL said. i "second the motion".

but then Ghost, you shouldn't expect much in the way of IQ/wit/knowledge from your correspondent, as he is a member in good-standing of "the DAMNyankee coven of lunatics, haters, weirdos,nitwits & bigots" after all.

free dixie,sw