Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
“I am not anonymous as “bvw”.”

... and anonymous is not anonymous to Dymond.

But it appears that the family of Waleed were not as concerned with the anonymity as you seem to be - since the anonymous writer was not out to impress you or anyone else, it’s his call.

617 posted on 04/22/2007 7:09:14 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies ]


To: RS
There is no anonymous and truthful writer proven.

I am not anonymous, and I am truthful. I have given my identity and address in postings -- years ago -- on this forum, as a matter of fact. There is no reason for me do so again, and there are many reasons not to do so.

I would prefer if those know my particulars to keep them private.

If -- if I was in the circumstance of one of those four students already named, already and currently publicly identified ... there then would be no reason to maintain my anonymity, and a very positive reason -- that is to vouchsafe this tale, to sign it, to validate it. That validation since it is an obvious way to honestly comfort the afflicted -- is the right and caring thing to do.

632 posted on 04/22/2007 7:49:06 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson