Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS

You said — “Obviously ANY distraction, like Waleeds movement kept the attention away from “A”.

Therefore we can take it as a FACT that the movement of Waleed, and the diversion of attention towards him and away from others in the room, was ABSOLUTLY a contributing factor in the survival of “A”.”

As we see from the account, the killer returned two other times “looking for signs of life”. Now, it is another stated fact (which we have no reason to doubt) that Waleed moved. And being that he was wounded, perhaps seriously, he might not have been able to stay still. In any case — he moved.

Now, the main premise to the entire story is that this movement saved the student’s life. But, we see from the facts that this is a false belief — which the student says is simply a “belief”

So, since we know that the killer is *looking* for signs of life — and we know that Waleed moved — yes, it is also very clear that when the killer shot Waleed, his *attention* was on Waleed as he was shooting him dead.

But, we must not ignore the fact that the killer was *looking* for signs of life and had returned twice, doing so. That means that once he shot Waleed, he’s doing what he came in the room to do — looking for signs of life.

Another fact of the matter is that the uninjured student is laying next to Waleed. Thus, the killer shoots Waleed, he is now dead. The killer is *already there* at the “live body” of the uninjured student. The killer doesn’t have to go across the room, doesn’t have to step across desks, doesn’t have to move anywhere. The killer is already there — right at the uninjured student’s body — who is feigning death.

We know that the killer is looking for signs of life, we know that Waleed is now dead, we know that the killer is right there since the uninjured student is laying next to Waleed...

Therefore — it’s apparent that what saved the uninjured student’s life, as Waleed is now dead, and the killer is right there at the live student’s body — was — the fact that the uninjured student played dead very well.

Waleed simply died, nothing more. He’s dead now. The uninjured student is alive, but feigning death. He feigned his death very well, while the killer — after killing Waleed is looking for signs of life.

Regards,
Star Traveler


545 posted on 04/22/2007 12:58:27 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
“But, we see from the facts that this is a false belief ...”

You keep repeating this, but the facts show you are wrong, and CANNOT know this.

You make statements like “ ...as Waleed is now dead, and the killer is right there at the live student’s body —”

You don’t know he is “right there” He could have shot Waleed from 20 feet away.

We know for a fact that the shooters inspections were NOT good enough, and any distraction by Waleed gave him less time to inspect the others.

You have stated many times that Waleeds action or non action is not connected whatsoever with “A”’s survival, yet you CANNOT know this.

We DO know that the shooter did not take the time to detect that “A” was playing dead. ANY time he spent on any other matter contributed to the survival of “A”.

546 posted on 04/22/2007 1:27:36 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson