You said — “Excuse me, ST, did I miss something? Wasn’t this an “anonymous” email? Or do we now have the name of the witness?”
No, it was simply an anonymous report to the public. That’s true. And there are not “witnesses” (in the plural). There is only *one anonymous e-mail. At least it’s anonymous to us.
Of course, pretty much all FReepers know that if we had all our news come from unverifiable sources and no way to ever question anything — and we had to simply *accept* whatever an anonymous e-mail said — then — the Democrats could make up a *boatload* of lies and no one would ever be able to say anything against the lies.
And so, this is simply an attempt to put a PC spin on Muslims “saving” someone (you see, since the Jews got into the act) — by the MSM — trying to use an *anonymous* e-mail to do it.
I can’t think of a *more unreliable source* than perhaps Miss Cleo...
BUT, for the sake of discussion, I can examine the so-called “facts” and measure them against the “anonymous witness” — who actually says that it’s *only a belief* that he was saved.
And from examining those presented facts — we see that the “movement” made absolutely no difference at all. The “anonymous student” is simply letting guilt feelings help him make up a fairy tale that makes him feel better...
Regards,
Star Traveler
The student who survived in that classroom -- their names are known. There is no reason for the eyewitness of such a event to remain anonymous -- except for fraud.