“Anonymous probably got his story wrong because that story doesn’t hold up”
Curious ... since the entire story appears to be -
“He believes he would have been shot dead were it not for Waleed’s “protective movement” that distracted the gunman.”
Just what part of that dosen’t hold up ?
Waleed “stirred” and anonymous interprets that as a “protective movement”.
Anonymous should be thanking God that Cho was alerted to Waleed by a providential movement.
This is nothing but a weak attempt to discount Lubresca’s true heroism.