Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

“She knows her role clearly made this hard money”

Hard money vs. soft. Now I understand.


77 posted on 04/21/2007 4:10:57 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: webstersII

By declaring the value of photographer Annie Leibovitz’s servies -— 3 x $2,000 -— Hillary knew that the in-kind contribution must be declared. By being involved in soliciting, coordinating, and reporting, it made it clear that all of Peter’s money had to be declared as hard money. She tried to claim that it was not specifically designated for her. For what else was it designated? Peter spent every penny specifically on her senate campaign. In addition, proof of her direct solicitation to Cher means that she had to report Cher’s in-kind contribution -— the value of her services. For a few songs, a corporation would probably pay a few hundred thousand dollars to Cher. That is the value. How about the others? Although we are not certain, she may have also solicited Diana Ross. It is time for the FEC to do a proper investigation now that they will be given evidence that had been hidden by a US Attorney while the investigations took place. We are going to put the heat on him. He or she will be named soon.

It is time for Obama and Edwards and others to get new life knowing that Hillary will be wounded. Maybe the traitor John Kerry will even get back into the race.


78 posted on 04/21/2007 4:56:29 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson