VT is in a no-win situation here.
Had VT expelled Cho, his parents (or ACLU or some bleeding heart organization) would have sued VT for violating his rights under ADA or whatever ruse they come up with.
As it is, some ambulance-chasing trial lawyer will sign up as many parents of the dead as he can, and sue VT into bankruptcy.
So, as conservatives, what do you think VT could or should have done differently (if anything), given the risks on all sides?
I really don’t know. I’m not into condemning them, nor anyone who really didn’t do the crime.
“So, as conservatives, what do you think VT could or should have done differently (if anything), given the risks on all sides?”
The only person so far I’ve seen who did something that made sense is the professor who refused to teach the kid and refused to have him in her class.
At that point another woman agreed to tutor him despite her fear for her own safety.
Wrong move.She should have refused as well.
Was VTech really going to risk losing 2 profs over one violent kid?
Everyone who was expected to pass him along should have refused.
That forces Cho up the chain of command until someone finally has to say the kid needs to go.
Colleges have expelled for much less than this.
Lieberalism is a mental disorder.
Therefore, universities have become a haven for those with mental disorders.
The logical solution is to concentrate it.
Transfer the mose lieberal professors to the most lieberal institutions. Do the same with the students and reorganize them as mental institutions.