Skip to comments.
Move on from abortion? Not on your life!
vanity
| April 20, 2007
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 04/20/2007 9:51:11 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500, 501-513 next last
To: jwalsh07
LOL, try a junior high school biology book. I've seen obtuse but you take the cake. Though "liberty4babykilling4ever" has been banned, my response is in post 450. I think you'll like it, FRiend.
461
posted on
04/23/2007 9:46:19 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Mr. Silverback
OK, glad you support my resolve to vote for Rudy during the general election if it ever comes to that (which I don’t think it will). That’s all I ever said I’d do on this thread.
462
posted on
04/23/2007 9:46:49 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: KevinDavis
So people who dont believe in certain things should be banned from here??? If the things they don't believe in are FR's founding principles, then they should at least tread lightly. If they believe the primary way to relate to the Founders' legacy is by viewing through the lens of thier worst moral failures, they should be shown the door.
463
posted on
04/23/2007 9:50:08 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Celtjew Libertarian
(Abortion, BTW, does not fit neatly into this framework, because there is a debate of when the fetus becomes a human individual with the rights of an infant. Even if you think the answer is obvious, the question is presently being debated.) *snip*
Now, my personal belief, is that happens sometime between first brain activity (at about 40 days) and viability (sometime around 21 weeks).
*snip*
If I were an atheist, I would be pro-life.
Your statements taken together make it clear that, like most pro-choicers, you desire to codify your subjective, unprovable religious beliefs in law and public policy, while accusing others of doing the same. 150 years ago, people like you were wringing your hands over whether or not Negroes really qualified as "human."
464
posted on
04/23/2007 9:53:29 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
These people cannot be allowed to return to power. I agrre. I just want people to stop fooling themselves into believeing that running a northeastern lib against a northeastern lib is not only good strategy, but our only viable option.
465
posted on
04/23/2007 9:56:09 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: mkjessup
And indeed, it came to pass that an ignorant little troll who shall be remembered as 'lib4all' was in fact, banned as predicted by several Freepers. I prefer" "liberty4babykilling". But I like yours.
466
posted on
04/23/2007 10:00:12 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: KevinDavis
So people who dont believe in certain things should be banned from here??? People can believe whatever they want. The site founder, however, has said that he will not tolerate people using the forum to promote a candidate who is almost completely at odds with the site's mission.
467
posted on
04/23/2007 10:04:10 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(A vote for Guiliani is a vote to kill conservatism.)
To: TAdams8591
From what I understood, Franklin messed around between when he met his wife and when he married her years later. People hear “illegitimate son” and assume that means that he cheated.
468
posted on
04/23/2007 10:04:27 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Mr. Silverback
Good afternoon, I’m thinking THIS thread was just the flight training simulation for the BIG thread now approaching 5000 posts, LOL
469
posted on
04/23/2007 10:05:54 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
To: shuckmaster
Well we certainly can't allow difference of opinion on this forum. Let's ban him for speaking his mind. Yes, yes, indeed, treating the Founders like a bunch of scumbags in order to promote ripping small children limb from limb is exactly what we should have on a conservative forum! Hear hear!
It's...
![](http://www.mustangmods.com/data/10900/brilliant.jpg)
BRILLIANT!!
470
posted on
04/23/2007 10:08:19 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: kevkrom
Absolutely wrong and insane, but consistent. Truth.
471
posted on
04/23/2007 10:12:22 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Sloth
Excellent post. See my 450 if you would...apparently, CeltJew thought the God of Israel was a flat earther...:-)
472
posted on
04/23/2007 10:14:13 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: mkjessup
Heh-heh! I’ve barely strated with that one. I might just lurk.
473
posted on
04/23/2007 10:15:17 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Mr. Silverback
To: Mr. Silverback
Yes, I saw that. Good response, though it’s almost embarrassing to have to prove something as silly as “humans are human.”
475
posted on
04/23/2007 10:27:08 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: FreeReign
Sorry, meant to post to both of you.
476
posted on
04/23/2007 10:30:33 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: Mr. Silverback
To: Sloth
478
posted on
04/23/2007 10:35:21 AM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
To: EveningStar
Please explain to me why the left can say pretty much anything it wants and it’s called either freedom of expression or freedom of speech. Big okay for them, they say.
But, how dare anyone — anyone at all — disagree with any of the liberals and we’re called “haters” and “warmongers.”
They want the two-party system as long as it’s Liberals on one side and Democrats on the other?
What kind of inbred debate would that be?
To: Truthsearcher
Thanks for clarifying my mistake.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500, 501-513 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson