[P-Marlowe]

She just couldn’t help but bash Bush and call for gun regulation at the end, could she? But other then that, it’s an excellent article.

It probably would not have been published by the LA Times unless it had some derogatory reference to Bush.

In fact, it would not surprise me at all if that little jab wasn't added by the editors after submission.

[shrinkermd]

Yes, I saw the same thing, but I agree one can read this article and see her point. After all, we are arguing positions, policies and events—not people— when we assess what she wrote.

[rob21]

“In fact, it would not surprise me at all if that little jab wasn’t added by the editors after submission.”

Yeah, it didn’t really seem to fit in. It kinda just came out of nowhere and ruined an otherwise good article, which is something I would expect from the libtards at the LA Times.