[Dick Bachert]

My, what an appropriate screen name you’ve chosen. TOTALLY!!

So you think a lesson in how the Constitution in this REPUBLIC WAS SUPPOSED to work for the PEOPLE (remember them?) is SPAM?

If you are so enamoured of the idea of monarchy, strong man and one man rule, it would be my distinct pleasure to buy your ONE WAY airfare to a place where such a system is currently in place: Venezuela, Iran or China come to mind.

I’m certain the rulers in those places would welcome another submissive, grovelling, toadying boot-licker — especially one who thinks a Constitution is a swell Atlanta newspaper.

[MortMan]

You're out of line, FRiend. This vanity clearly advocates for the use of a specific information source - TRIM. As such, and being a vanity, it is fair game to call it spam, although it is also fair game for you to disagree.

If you are so enamoured of the idea of monarchy, strong man and one man rule, it would be my distinct pleasure to buy your ONE WAY airfare to a place where such a system is currently in place: Venezuela, Iran or China come to mind.

I’m certain the rulers in those places would welcome another submissive, grovelling, toadying boot-licker — especially one who thinks a Constitution is a swell Atlanta newspaper.

For your coup de grace, you advise JustaDumbBlonde to head for marxist climes, using just that totalitarian abusive attitude they have almost perfected. It's a shame, really. You wrote an effective piece of informative and entertaining work, then threw it away on what I perceive to be a pithy comment from a poster. I guess a level headed response was just too much work?

Or do you simply suffer from thinning skin?

At any rate, you owe JustaDumbBlonde an apology for your abusive reply.

[JustaDumbBlonde]

"My, what an appropriate screen name you’ve chosen. TOTALLY!!

Gee, thanks! I think the first half of your screen name is a appropriate descriptor for you as well.