Posted on 04/19/2007 1:39:56 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
Actually, the USPS recommends that you DO NOT open any suspicious looking packages. There were signs in every USPS office showing an example of a suspicious looking letter. Now if you want to open those types of letters, that is your choice. If someone sends me a letter with Allah Akbar written on it or some Islamic looking return address. That letter is going straight to the trash if only slightly suspicious or will be reported to local officials if highly suspicious.
Why? Do you think it's really helpful to watch these so called journalists and their so called experts analyze this when they are fully unqualified either by resume or totality of information?
If I’m a witness to something and the authorities tell me not to say anything about it or keep quiet, I’ll tell them to “shove it” and I’ll say whatever I want to say and I’ll release whatever I want to release. That’s my *total determination* and it does not involve the authorities...
Big deal...with rights come responsibilities.
If they must show a picture, show one of the perp with his face blown off.
Have fun.
You’re rights have not been abridged, if you decide to throw that mail away. However, if the government comes and says that a certain piece of mail, you cannot handle, you cannot open and you cannot make a decision as to what you’re going to do with it — then — your rights have been abridged and compromised...
Well, we recently passed legislation that allows citizens to opt out of junk mailings. If someone sends me a letter that obviously has white powder falling out of it, the USPS is going to held liable if they deliver anthrax into my office.
Well, I understand how you feel, but begging the government to censor what we see and hear probably isn’t a good answer. ;)
You said — “I just think there may be times when we need to cooperate with investigators. NBC snubbed them when they opened the envelope. They knew it was from Cho, and decided to screw the investigation anyway, for higher ratings. It was a selfish act in my opinion.”
I may decide to cooperate with a piece of mail, but that — in no way — takes away my right to open it and examine it, if I decide to do so. So, it’s this right that I’m talking about. And if the government wants to abridge that right — then — they can go to court and get that court order. It will be *my decision* in the first and and last place — and no government authorities are going to tell me any differently.
Regards,
Star Traveler
NBC did the right thing. I’m tired of the media deciding what to show and what not to show. I want it all shown, so that I can decide what’s the truth, rather than having some liberal network exec deciding what news is important for me.
Their decision to air that stuff is just sick beyond words.
You said — “Why? Do you think it’s really helpful to watch these so called journalists and their so called experts analyze this when they are fully unqualified either by resume or totality of information?”
I really don’t care what the journalists say, in the way of “analysis” — but only in the way of factual information. If they want to analyze, well I tell them to “have at it” — but I don’t have to listen, if I don’t want to. I only want the raw facts and whatever pertains to that. The rest of what they say, well..., I’ll take under advisement.
.
You said — “Big deal...with rights come responsibilities.”
And that will be me who will determine those responsibilities, and not the authorities or my neighbors.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Ever since the cancellation of Imus, I’ve come to the conclusion that Steve Capus is an idiot.
Why do parents of victims want to cry on national TV. Must be the Jerry Springer attitude. Serves no purpose but to let people know they hurt.
NBC has finally showed some Chestnuts.
What more are we to learn from this incoherent, rambling nonsense that we already don't know about this unhinged maniac?
No. Most of the world is sane. This info was put out so folks could see who the killer was and what he was about. The idea that it should be kept from everyone to prevent copycats is ridiculous.
You said — “Well, we recently passed legislation that allows citizens to opt out of junk mailings. If someone sends me a letter that obviously has white powder falling out of it, the USPS is going to held liable if they deliver anthrax into my office.”
Opt out I can understand. That remains your decision.
Well, being safe with your mail is important, too. And so, public safety *will* in many instances trump individual rights and courts would allow that, if necessary. And that’s the function that the courts have — which is to mediate and make decisions between competing rights.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Good point. NBC hyped that they had this exclusive; started advertising it in the early afternoon to get their ratings up for the evening news. They succeeded...Drudge reports a blow-out for NBC on this story — very high audience.
The decision was based solely on the almighty buck. Disgraceful.
I sent FNC a very nasty email this morning, I was sickened by their continued coverage of the video.
But the blame goes to NBC; they “own it” as Brian William said before the decision to air it and others followed suit.
I'm not convinced that publicity is what these wackos seek. I think their deed is done when they are dead. If they wanted to bask in their glory, they would be captured and flaunt the system.
And as for troubling the families by the broadcast of the offenders thoughts, I am sure the families are grieving and not watching NBC. And I'd add, if that bothers anyone, TV's have an ON/OFF button.
As for copycats, bring them on. Let's finally purge the gene pool of these subhuman types. The copycats already has the idea and probability of action, just waiting for the spirit to move them. I don't think I can count on one hand copycats to these tragedies. Can someone provide a list of the original crime and the copycat crime. This talk was good for a tv movie, but doesn't really hold water.
I wish NBC would have broadcast everything in it entirety, but time will not allow. That is a job for the newspapers. A 3000 word diatribe cannot be scheduled for TV.
I e-mailed FNC last night and told them that one news cycle was enough. It’s bad enough we have weeks and months worth of coverage of an endless parade of human debris.
Amen. Sometimes I wonder what people are thinking. The same group that was so upset that the networks stopped showing the planes crashing into the WTC towers are the same ones that are so upset that the press is finally releasing information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.