Replies

And by tough sledding, it means that there will be a lot more posters who will be arguing against them than normal, and the arguments might get more heated because it will feel like an infiltration. When I post at a liberal site, I expect 20 people to jump down my throat, and that's what pro-rudy people should expect here.

I believe you have missed about 99% of my argument.

I may have missed 99% of your postings, although I highly doubt it.

However, I was expounding on dirtboy's response you your last post, and specifically the part of your post where you said: But as you are aware, the rules are different for different candidates. And that, my friend, is simply disingenuous.

I believe 100% of your argument there was that it was disingenuous that Rudy was treated under different rules than other candidates. If that is only 1% of your argument, you should probably post the other 99% of why it is wrong for the most liberal candidate to get a lot more grief and for posters against him to be given a lot more latitude than they are when criticizing a more conservative, more acceptable candidate.

I'm sure you must have one great argument if what you said was only 1%. But so long as it's trapped inside your head, it isn't doing you any good. Let if free, if it loves you, it will come back to you -- no, never mind that....