Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68; Jim Robinson
I have absolutely no problem with that on any of the candidates. But as you are aware, the rules are different for different candidates.

Can you cite a single verifiable fact about any other GOP candidate which has been disallowed here?

I have little doubt that Rudy's aspirations for the presidency go back years (long before 9/11). If he was as astute as his supporters claim, he shouldn't have made leftist speeches to leftist groups.

268 posted on 04/20/2007 6:55:12 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Looks like you are alerting the founder to another who needs to be zotted. I'm sure he has all the help he can handle.

Can you cite a single verifiable fact about any other GOP candidate which has been disallowed here?

Is that really a serious question? I'm saying that supporters of all of the candidates are not under a similar set of rules, as has been explained to me over the past several posts by another poster. Argue with him, not me. I think they should all be vetted equally. But if Fred enters the race, you will see little appreciation here for the treatment accorded the other 3 major candidates.

I have little doubt that Rudy's aspirations for the presidency go back years (long before 9/11). If he was as astute as his supporters claim, he shouldn't have made leftist speeches to leftist groups.

I'm not even discussing Rudy, nor have I been.

274 posted on 04/20/2007 7:06:53 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson