I will vote for whichever R is nominated. I understand the danger of the clintons.
If another R emerges who is a stronger candidate, I will support that R. We will lose only if we, each of us with our own vote, votes for the other guy.
Funny you should ask about GHWBush. He lost because he was a fool and ultimately irresponsible. He understood that the clintons were unfit to lead, he had the goods on clinton, but never used it.
This is not unlike what you would be doing.
It is not your whole point. You are pushing a flawed candidate who would rift the party the way Papa Bush's leftward drift did in 1992.
Funny you should ask about GHWBush. He lost because he was a fool and ultimately irresponsible. He understood that the clintons were unfit to lead, he had the goods on clinton, but never used it.
Oh, yeah, sure. He had the goods on them. That's a good one.
Bush was a fool because he drifted leftwards. But he went nowhere near as far left as Rudy is now, even with his attempts to move rightward.
This is not unlike what you would be doing.
6.2 percent, Mia. That is Rudy's support among Freepers. Pretty pathetic. Shows he has no support among conservatives. You need to drop your support of Rudy and quit trying to redefine the concept of pro-life the way you have here. Our definition of such works just fine.
As will I. Thanks for all that you do, Mia T. OUTSTANDING!